The operator does not deal the cards
Six of these ten publish a list of the studios that supply them, running from 19 names to 120. Evolution appears in all six, and in 27 of the 33 supplier lists read across the hundred brands. The table is the studio's product; the clauses around it are the operator's.
| Coins | Withdrawal limit | Before ID check | Operator | Licence | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vave | from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8 | case by case | Latcas B.V. | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Play |
| Rocketpot | 5,000 USD /month cl. 11.5 | US$2,500 | Danneskjold Ventures B.V. | Curacao | Play |
| Bitcasino.io | 1,000,000 USDT /week cl. 6.10 | 2,500 EUR | Moon Technologies B.V. | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Play |
| Wild Fortune | 15,000 EUR /month cl. 11.8 | case by case | Metlait SRL | Anjouan Gaming Board | Play |
| DuckDice | not published | case by case | Zentari Limitada | Anjouan Gaming Board | Play |
| Empire.io | not published | 2,000 USDT | Pixel Entertainment Limited | Anjouan Gaming Board | Play |
| Metaspins | not published | case by case | Metaspins N.V. | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Play |
| Rainbet | not published | case by case | RBGAMING N.V. | Anjouan Gaming Board | Play |
| Wild.io | 100,000 USD /week cl. 9.6 | case by case | Nonce Gaming B.V. | Curaçao Gaming Authority | Play |
| Wolf.bet | not published | case by case | Cipher Games Ltd | Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros | Play |
Vave
Rocketpot
Wild Fortune
DuckDice
Metaspins
Wild.io
Wolf.betThe stream comes from a studio, and the page around it comes from the operator
A live dealer table is a video feed from a studio floor. The dealer is employed by the studio, the shoe and the wheel belong to the studio, and the result is produced there, in front of a camera, before any casino page displays it.
The operator's contribution is the page, the account, and the terms.
That division is not a technicality. It decides what a comparison between two casinos can and cannot mean, because the same table can be, and routinely is, embedded at several competing brands at once. Two operators showing the same studio's blackjack are showing the same dealer, the same cards and the same outcome to two sets of players who each believe they are comparing casinos.
What differs between them is everything written around the stream.
Six of the ten publish who supplies them
Operators rarely put a supplier count in their terms, but most publish a provider index, filter or sitemap on their own site — a page listing the studios whose games are integrated. For six of the ten compared here, that page could be read and counted on 26 August 2026.
Bitcasino.io lists 120 studios. Wild.io lists 80. Empire.io lists 79. Rainbet lists 33. Wolf.bet lists 32. DuckDice lists 19.
Four operators — Vave, Rocketpot, Wild Fortune and Metaspins — have no such list in our reading, and their cell stays empty. As everywhere else on this site, that empty cell records a reading, not a lobby.
These numbers are a weaker kind of record than the ones in the comparison table, and the difference should be stated rather than glossed. A withdrawal ceiling comes with a clause number in a contract. A supplier list comes from the operator's own catalogue pages, which carry no clause number and can change without any notice at all. It is still the operator's own published document, which is why it is used here and why the date it was read travels with it. A catalogue page and a numbered clause are marked as different grades of record throughout the crypto casinos listed for Singapore.
A six-fold spread between 19 and 120 is real. What it measures is narrow: how many suppliers are integrated, not how many titles came with each integration.
One name is in all six, and in twenty-seven of thirty-three
Across the hundred brands, thirty-three publish a readable supplier list. Evolution appears in twenty-seven of them.
It appears in all six of the lists on this table.
No other supplier is close. Ezugi appears in twelve of the thirty-three, Winfinity in ten, Live88 and Pragmatic Play Live in eight each, Bombay Live in six. Those are the names that actually run live tables, as distinct from the slot studios that make up the bulk of every list.
The consequence for a reader is direct. If one supplier is integrated at twenty-seven of the thirty-three brands whose lists we could read, then “which of these casinos has the best live tables” is, for the most part, a question about a company none of them owns. The differentiator is not the dealer.
Concentration of that order is the most reliable finding on this page, and it is the least visible one from inside a lobby.
The live-specific names, operator by operator
Filter each of the six lists down to studios that produce live tables and the picture separates sharply.
Bitcasino.io's list carries fifteen of them: Evolution, Ezugi, Bombay Live, Live88, LiveSpins, Live Solutions, Microgaming Live, CreedRoomz, Asia Gaming, BetGamesTV, Winfinity, 7 Mojos, Ebet, OneTouch and Sexy. That is the widest live coverage on this table by a distance, which is consistent with it also carrying the longest supplier list overall.
Empire.io carries six: Evolution, Asia Gaming, BetGames.tv, Bombay Live, Live88 and OneTouch. Wolf.bet also carries six, and a different six: Evolution Gaming, BeterLive, Bombay Live, Copacabana, EAGaming and Winfinity.
Wild.io carries four: Evolution, Pragmatic Play Live, Winfinity and Live Vegas. Rainbet carries two, Evolution and OneTouch. DuckDice carries two, Evolution and Ezugi.
Two of the six, then, offer a live floor built almost entirely on a single supplier.
That is a meaningful difference between operators — not in the quality of any table, which is the studio's business, but in how many distinct floors an account reaches. It is also the only game-side difference on this table that can be read from a document rather than felt in a lobby, and what can be checked about a game sets out where the readable evidence stops.
What the operator does control
Three things around the table belong to the operator, and all three are written down.
The first is the bet range offered on a given table, which an operator selects from the configurations a studio makes available. The second is the withdrawal clause that governs the balance produced at that table, which is where the ceilings and identity triggers on this site's comparison actually bite. The third is the bonus contribution schedule.
The third is the one that catches people.
A contribution schedule lists game categories against the share of each stake that counts toward a wagering requirement. Slots commonly count in full, table games commonly count nothing, and live dealer play is often excluded outright. A player who takes an offer and then sits at a live table can wager for hours while the requirement stays exactly where it started — which is how a headline of 150% becomes worth close to nothing to someone who came for the tables rather than the reels.
For nine of these ten, no document setting out the governing promotional terms could be found at all, which means the schedule question cannot even be put to them. The tenth, Vave, publishes a percentage on a promotions page and no multiple, no base and no schedule beside it. Every clause that decides an offer's value, and which of them exist here, is walked through on bonus terms.
The stream is the studio's. The condition attached to what you win on it is not.
The provably fair guarantee stops at the studio door
Five of these ten publish a provably fair mechanism: DuckDice, Metaspins, Rainbet, Wild.io and Wolf.bet. It is a real procedure and it covers a specific set of games — in-house originals built around a hash chain the player can recompute after a round.
A live table is not one of them.
A physical wheel spun in front of a camera produces its result in the room, not from a seed, so there is nothing for a player to recompute afterwards. The same is true of third-party slots, which run on the studio's own servers. Anyone reading a provably fair badge as a statement about the live floor is reading it several rooms away from where it applies.
What replaces it at a live table is the studio's own certification and the operator's licence position, and neither is verifiable by the player in the way a seed is. That is a narrower guarantee, and it should be described as one.
The four blanks, and what they are not
Vave, Rocketpot, Wild Fortune and Metaspins publish no supplier index we could read. Their live floors may be wide or narrow; this desk does not know, and does not guess.
An operator without a readable supplier list is not an operator without suppliers.
Nobody here has opened an account, played a hand, or watched a table at any of the ten, so there is no assessment of stream quality, dealer conduct or table availability anywhere on this page. The counts above come from pages the operators publish about themselves, read on a single day, and they are reported with that limit attached. The full reading rule, including which captures were discarded, is on who reads the documents.